10 years ago that the state revenue through the use of high-density spectrum (2.5 GHz to 42 GHz). The reason is simple: we have never defined a criterion for final assessment. Ruled only a provisional canon between the 2T98 and until 3Q99, which was dismissed before the first protest of arbitrariness and Pending a final. The lack of criteria for the collection of fees produces multiple injuries radio:
1) 10 years ago that the State does not receive a monthly income that correspond to the use of spectrum in question,
2) Part of this income is no longer recover because if not paid, the debts due after five years,
3) It has generated a debt undetermined - but millionaire - which involves several problems: a.
Companies are no longer interested in providing the service - in whole or in part - can not return the spectrum to the State for having debt. B..
The State can not undertake new spectrum auctions to define rates. For example, the lack of competition delay rates in 3.5 GHz band
c. The last two points have led to a parallel market for buying and selling companies for lack of spectrum
For an approximation of the money he has resigned, the State may make the exercise of considering the original appraisal and existing user base at the time of suspension of payment. Obviously, this is merely an exercise to have a dimension of the case, it is assumed that the State is devising other criteria (see here ). The amount of monthly debt by radio rates under the original scheme would be $ 370,500, almost $ 4,500,000 a year.
The table above shows that, as of December 2009, and there are 124 months of accumulated debt. This yields a total of debts of nearly $ 46,000,000. Unfortunately, 48% of that figure can not be claimed to have spent five years (60 months) since their inception.
PS: Thanks to the masked friend for help.
0 comments:
Post a Comment