From the series: "On Thursday, paella"
twenty years ago, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Bertin Osborne in a scuffle over who sustained the legality of a villa with the City of Jerez de la Frontera, this ruling was to pronounce the mayor, Pedro Pacheco, the famous phrase "Justice is a joke" which earned processing (which came out, I think, acquitted). Hopefully
what is happening now with the Justice was a joke and I hope that what happened was for a take away from there leave the chalet building.
The show that has given us the Constitutional Court these days has been embarrassing. Shameful, outrageous, dramatic and very dangerous. Many years ago when it was established by organic law for the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Judicial Council would be formed by nomination in Parliament, ie, attributed shares of judges or of judges, directors according to the representation of each match, and there were voices who warned that something like this could happen, also was a bad premise to establish that a particular judge may be in a particular environment and specific political party. Institutionalize what should respond to the body's inner court is a mixed message with the image of independence that must always surround the judicial power. Some replied that this way of parliamentary appointment was less bad than the corporate selection, which would make judges an estate closed and inaccessible, the reality of the rusty and extremely ultraconservative judiciary that prevailed then (and now has changed, but very bit) gave the victory to the parliamentary option. After all, they must have thought the conformists and accommodating, the parliament represents to ordinary citizens.
But what happened to the challenge of several articles of vacuum, and mindundi pocaleche Catalan statute was simply indescribable. Let the very fact of such a challenge like something out of the kennel, we pass the fact that many of the items challenged as unconstitutional for statute has been celebrated with joy for the Andalusian Statute like something out of the fold that Kennel has been behaving in that obsessive eagerness to muddy and dirty even in his last molecule nothing clean the English political origin. But you can not ignore the gilts were mounted on the Court Constitutional.
The play is as follows: of the twelve members, six have been appointed by the PP and six by the other political forces. But it happens that the Chair of TC is occupied by a member of the other , ie non peper, whereupon the casting vote is favorable to the non-conservative. What does the PP? The big play: refusal by any bullshit to one of the judges, specifically the one designated by CiU, this may not vote on their own challenge as it gets 6 to 5 in favor of peper , thus, not a tie, the casting vote is not necessary. "Business? No: pig as could be.
Response of others: the challenged resigns and immediately appointed another to replace him and the proportions are restored as they were before, so the PP is left with an inch of his nose.
funny thing is the angry outburst Zaplana to the neutralization of its points: it's replacement would be outraged and challenged itself to the machinations of a government that wants to neutralize the action against the as statute. That is, the Government plays dirty but the PP, the PP has moved dawn cleaning pigeon, do not fuck ... Both maneuvers are as legal as dirty, but Zaplana denied to others who can benefit from the law so nasty as he.
Meanwhile, English stunned and scared shitless attended the unprecedented spectacle because, of course, is not political but the nth silting behind us which should be more independent of the three powers (oh, Montesquieu, who saw you and who sees what the fuck have made your invention!). All who have interests pending resolution of the Justice are shit scared trying to guess whether the judge or court that will depend more rightist or leftist and to try to establish what this judge think about the direction ideological interests of those who are in our hands. Frightening. This brown
Constitutional Court makes the climax to the state of real institutional catastrophe that we are and that people try to circumvent the Italian carrying out our personal lives, families and professionals regardless of that alien world in which the public is living -and beyond the political and even though from time to time need, or does not need, suffer-action emanating from that world.
And so it goes.
____________________ Days pass and, although the furious barking not leave us a little peace to meditate quietly, some things come out to light, are evidenced on the peace process that went into the guano with the bombing of the T-4. And that evidence-depressive, desolate, is, again, the political and intellectual dwarfism Zap I The Anodyne . We now know that the famous peace process was smoke. Smoke like something was properly planned and considered. It was a simple affair. Zap
got into this concoction clouded by the immense political capital, legitimate, moreover, that would have provided a successful attempt. It was precisely these revenues-and legitimacy-which had been planned well beyond the time in the future, which alarmed even the climax to the pound, which was dedicated with all its force to sabotage it from all sides and also undisguised. They preferred the rapid effectiveness systematically sapping surface the hidden underground mining but slow.
However, it has been the pound which has been loaded process, despite their hard work and their joy by bursting. It was his own intellectual asthenia Zapatero. Without measuring temporary provisions, without establishing what minimum require the other party or which give maximum by itself, without setting a minimum guarantee on the validity and representativeness of its partners, was launched in mind vacuum improvise on the fly, to go by as events were occurring. This was not obvious to the citizen: we have seen when trying to explain what had happened. Nor was it clear to the kennel, he was lying in a shameless and unworthy Zapatero saying that ETA had given what is now evident that it had given and the kennel, in turn, had not the slightest indication. But ETA knew what he had been given, which was nothing, and what had not been given, that was all, and, thinking he teased, he turned to murder people to clean bombing. Let's also say, in passing, that ETA had not, in turn, nothing, lest the innocent appear to be the case. Hardly.
A pusillanimous began to talk of anything useful with a ghost of herriko tavern-inn, or rather, while the kennels from both sides saw them and wanted to break the deck. In the end it achieved independence kennel.
So we are: between the right kennel and mental sterility of a left mostly composed of about half illiterate upstart, running aimlessly and with no horizon, and an empanada mental concepts that will not let them bluff to cling to. In the end, reason will reader telling me that by this way Pirate Party has certain electoral chances.
Is there a remedy for all this? ____________________
One or two pans ago, I expressed my strong mosqueo to the anti-squatter campaign unleashed by the council inherited and their lackeys campaign that used the famous neatly case of Urgell in which the owner of an apartment he found that it had occupied (without K) while being repaired or rehabilitated. That image, that of an ordinary gentleman who is appropriating the floor of a beast so was the one used to cause alarm social and promote a general feeling in favor of a hard line against such occupations (without K) ... and against the other (K \u200b\u200b ).
When the judge forced the occupants (without K ) long with a fresh wind, but without seeing clear -and said so explicitly, the illegitimacy of such an occupation (without K) and wrinkled her nose. What happens then? What is not clear that the judge sees it as unclear, moreover, it explicitly states?
Finally, when the occupants (without K ) agreed or were forced to take off ... we knew that the full building belonged to the family of the owner concerned. So it was no longer "seen in some form, of a citizen exactly like the common. This is a pisoteniente - per se book or familiarity. For there may be explain the reluctance of the judge.
And there it has stayed with the ass naked designers hereditary municipal policy and its dirty tricks forgers to lend a sardine ember to a subject that not only did not cause any alarm but had raised social the sympathy of not a few social and civic sectors ... and not least that of the residents affected.
And it is caught before a liar than a lame. ____________________
On Thursday, 15, already point to the carnival. Talk about them. And worse, as might be expected. But the next paella is not without difficulties: on Thursday I will have it very difficult to write and Wednesday, which is the day that usually prepared, not have it easy. But, hey, if I have to sleep a couple hours at least, try to meet on time and still maintain at minimum, unfortunately I can not say time low, since there has been, the bar fault. Forward
lanterns. "The hassle" as always, will be there between pans. And do not forget that from time to time, the scripts of TV Internet users out of the same feather. Keyboard, go ...
Unavailable to discouragement, which said ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment