From the series "Ordinary mail"
I have followed with special interest in the issue of Jesus Quintero interview to José María García made by TVE and condemned it. Now I say this property: censored. Do not want to talk about, much less do so in terms exhaustive, until you've had a chance to see the interview, in the certainty that sooner or later it would leak on the Web in one way or another, yet another good reason to bless Network relentlessly. Indeed, the leak has occurred and there is completita interview so that everyone can judge for yourself. Document to his or her own necessary, given the dust that is raised, the which, as always, obscures both the road and the surrounding landscape, which otherwise, would be to the stories, almost always treacherous and the manipulation of stakeholders and their censing of the various media groups .
I must say, moreover, that the seriousness of the matter has led me to an important chord exception: when Jesus Quintero opened this new series of interviews with Farruquito happy-a convicted murderer, who goes getting around, up the victim with an incredible nose, I determined not to see even one of their programs. But if there had been, probably would not have seen anyway interview with José María García for a reason nothing personal and also extended to others: I carry a lot of those who, having excellent information, engaged and committed, not released, or released with half-words, in minute portions carefully cut safety, until that information is no longer operational, but for the history book. I can not stop thinking about that person a journalist, do not forget, you have this information and hidden (an act against nature in his profession, but that is practiced in mass) stands as a judge of what is to happen and than not, who is to sink and who is not who deserves the glory and who want, without the citizens, those shits that are laughs to the very Constitution when it says we are the home of national sovereignty, we have nothing to do or nothing to say. The information is hidden from us and when we do, we manipulated delivered, cooked and made up until they know it or her father.
I've swallowed the whole interview. De pe a pa. And as close to injury (and that does not mean you get to them), the most virulent broaching to individuals is classified as cheating Florentino Perez and type impresentable Miguel Blesa, president I do not know if it now or in the true then - Caja Madrid and all this time of the transfer of such Figo to Real Madrid and there was a guarantee to that illustrious through reason. Of course, in the forty-odd minutes it takes the interview explains various facts that may or may not believe that compromise, of course, political and media honesty of many people, but are people who lead a public life and have be to these comments.
And here's the question. The civil and criminal protection called right to honor and reputation has been exacerbated, with tolerance and cooperation, nothing innocent indeed, some judges, to the point to be a genuine instrument of censorship in private hands ... that can be used in public hands. So I did not say anything at first. TVE decided not to give an interview because, they say literally, is full of insults and disqualifications. Sure, the editor (not the hosting provider , Judge: editor) is civilly liable for the insults. If José María García have poured so much defamation, TVE might have had to compensate in large amounts to those harmed by the veteran journalist and in this case, the airing of the interview not be justified, is justified as an editor does not allow the inclusion of an item when you realize you could be a criminal offense or a civil offense that could cost him dearly, financially expensive to the publisher.
We-all citizens-a problem with this item. It is well known by all rights abuse being committed by the $ EAG with the Association of Internet taking advantage of this insane law and it seems that, finally (and without launching bells ringing yet), we will go free (U.S. and Incidentally, all the English technology sector and all future development English, no less). It is also known half of the prostitutes in this country saturate the limited availability of resources and time of administration of justice quarreling or suing the other half of the brothel by pull me off of those statements in the past or that tomato sauce. The same applies to public figures who court sting of criticism, it is true that sometimes very incisive, but that they must bear - which made his public performance.
attacks to honor and image must be reinterpreted. When someone says that that minister is a bastard , should be required to punish the courts, provide compelling evidence that this outburst is directed precisely and accurately direct the person in question, not the post exercise thereof, as is more common. And the right of the image is lost when it is voluntarily made public by the interested party: when you hang your picture on a billboard, must be willing to endure some gameberrete wick if you painted whiskers. Protecting the honor and own image were designed to protect against intrusions on privacy, not armor against criticism and against discrepancies to be thrown into the public arena in search of well paid feeder and thrive.
The high courts, the Supreme and Constitutional, have repeatedly ruled that freedom of expression has limits, yes, but very wide, because it is a good special constitutional protection. In the interest and benefit of certain individuals, there are too many, I repeat, too, judges engaged in close at all costs.
me get it now, above, will be that judges without censors, some , which should be promptly identified and removed, along with CEO TVE, will engage in intensive censorship with the bloody excuse of injuries to benefit ... by the way: to whose benefit?
shame!
0 comments:
Post a Comment